GMD Public Portal

City Logo

Links

Address

Growth Management
Division - Planning
and Regulation
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104

Inspections:
(239) 252-2406
Permit Cancellations
Permit Extensions:
(239) 252-2493
E-Permitting:
(239) 252-2332
Permit Issuance:
(239) 252-2428
E-Planning:
(239) 252-1036
Floodplain Hotline:
(239) 252-2942
Code Enforcement:
(239) 252-2440
Contractor's Licensing:
(239) 252-2431
Other:
(239) 252-2400

Planning Application Status



 / 

Note: You can collapse and expand individual sections by clicking the header of the section you wish to collapse/expand.

Summary
PL20170004414
Russell Square RPUD (PUDZ)
Pre-Application Meeting (Status: Complete - Add Application Type)
Planned Unit Development Rezone (Status: Under Review - Closed for Uploads)
Under Review - Closed for Uploads
12/19/2017
ROBERT L TETRAULT REV TRUST KATHLEEN M TETRAULT REV TR
Proposed PUD rezone to allow 224 residential dwelling units with access from Cope Lane
Locations
Address
2505 Sunset BLVD

Address
2402 Sunset BLVD

Address
2401 Sunset BLVD

Address
2380 Sunset BLVD

Property
407720006

Property
407840009

Property
407960002

Property
408120003

Property
408200004

Property
407520002

Application Types (Click to See Reviews)
Pre-Application Meeting
Complete - Add Application Type
Pre-Application      Status: Accepted
Planned Unit Development Rezone
Planning Commission & Board of Commissioners
Under Review - Closed for Uploads
3 Re-Submittal      Status: Accepted
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 08/15/2018 08/14/2018
Annis Moxam ((239) 252-5519)   Send Email
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 08/15/2018 07/20/2018
Sue Faulkner ((239) 252-5715)   Send Email
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 08/15/2018 08/27/2018
Craig Brown ((239) 252-2548)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/13/2018

Please provide a tree survey of the area labeled as FLUCCS 212. This area is labeled as #1 on the Environmental Data exhibit Native Habitat. If the trees present meet the LDC requirement (Density and size) (3.05.07.A.2) they should be included as part of the existing native vegetation calculations.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/27/2018

Please revise the Native Habitat Exhibit (Environmental Data). Please clarify if the existing vegetation (shown as Area 2) present is native and should be included as discussed with ES Staff during the meeting for this project. All of the native vegetation present in area 2 of the Native Habitat Exhibit should be included in the overall native vegetation calculations. The increase in native vegetation should also be reflected on the Master Plan calculations. Additionally, a note needs to be added to the Master Plan Under Native Tree calculations stating: The .52 acre area shown on the Master plan is in addition to the _______ minimum acres required Preserve for a total of ______Acres. **(The numbers to be filled in are subject to change based native vegetation calculations.)
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/13/2018

The Master Concept Plan note 3; this note will need to be revised. Staff is currently in discussions regarding what the revised wording will be. Please contact Staff for the updated revised wording for this note. See note 2 of the MCP.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/13/2018

Revise Exhibit A. (page 2 0f 12) Please add the following wording as a clarifying statement just under the words "Allowable Uses:" "Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves." Or wording that refers to the LDC for allowable uses.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/15/2018

The MCP indicates with shading that a portion of the northward preserve is going to be replanted. Its not clear what the size of this restoration area will be. Please clarify. .52 ac of 20 trees to be saved from the 72 Pine trees and 7 Palms existing trees present in the pasture area x 25%
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 08/15/2018 07/19/2018
Thomas Mastroberto ((239) 252-7348)   Send Email
School District Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 08/15/2018 08/08/2018
James Sabo ((239) 252-2708)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/08/2018

A school district review was requested from Collier County Public Schools. A review comment response has not yet been provided, but may be forthcoming. As of 8/8/18 a school district review has not been provided. School district comments may be provided at a later time.
Transportation Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 08/15/2018 08/15/2018
Michael Sawyer ((239) 252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Outstanding
07/18/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.3: This petition request is now scheduled for Public Hearings. Therefore Transportation Planning Staff does not find this request consistent with the GMP and is recommending denial. Specifically staff finds that the petition is not consistent with GMP Transportation Element, Policy 9.3, and the LDC sections 4.04.02.B.3 and 4.07.02.J.4. Please also see review comment 1 and 2 below. Rev.2: Please see review 1 comment below. Interconnection has not been provided. Rev.1: Please revise master plan to accommodate the interconnection with Taormina Reserve PUD to the north as briefly discussed at the pre app meeting. This includes 60 foot total ROW for Sunset Boulevard Extension with sidewalks on both sides of the public access road. Please show this extension on the master plan and provide a developer commitment.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Resolved
08/15/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.2: Commitment provided for Cope Lane, thank you. Please revise commitment to indicate construction will simply be to county standards. Rev.1: Please show the construction of Cope Lane to intersection with Sunset Boulevard noted in review one comment above. This should also be noted as a developer commitment.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Resolved
08/15/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.2: Commitment provided, thank you; however it does not contain current required language. Please add….”based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval.” Rev.1: Provide developer commitment for standard trip limit consistent with TIS.
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 08/15/2018 08/08/2018
James Sabo ((239) 252-2708)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/08/2018

There have been sign deviations requested. They will be reviewed. Should you have any additional sign deviation requests. Please include them in the response letter. Not Resolved: Diana Compagnone comments here: Deviation 1, Please porvide a timeframe that can be measured versus a percentage of sales. For example, through December 2020. RESOLVED Deviation 2, Resolved. Deviation 3, The incorrect code was provided. Please correct the code to 5.06.02 B.14, the deviation requested is nearly 400% greater than is allowed by code. The deviation appears too large for a boundary marker. RESOLVED
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 08/15/2018 08/08/2018
Heidi Ashton-Cicko ((239) 252-8773)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/07/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: According to the survey, Sunset Boulevard bisects this proposed PUD. Please explain why this roadway is removed from the PUD master plan? And please demonstrate that no one has a right of access through this roadway? [6-22-18 no title information was provided]
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/08/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: See comments and changes dated 6-26-18 on the proposed PUD document, to be provided by the County planner. Only some of the comments were addressed. See review dated 7-8-18
Landscape Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 08/15/2018 08/14/2018
Mark Templeton ((239) 252-2475)   Send Email
4.06.02 Perimeter landscape buffers
Resolved
08/14/2018

4.06.02. Provide perimeter landscape buffers. See also LDC section 4.06.02 C, Table 2.4. Buffers are required per code even where they abut preserves on the adjacent parcel. Please remove the phrase "no buffer required" and label these as Type 'B' buffers. Alternatively, deviations may be requested to reduce or remove these buffers. If deviations from the code required buffers are requested, please provide supporting documentation and photos as part of the justification.
4.06.02 Perimeter landscape buffers
Resolved
08/14/2018

4.06.02. Provide perimeter landscape buffers. See also LDC section 4.06.02 C, Table 2.4. For the preserve adjacent to Santa Barbara Blvd, please add the note that the preserve meets buffer requirements after removal of exotics or supplemental planting will be provided to meet buffer requirements. Please provide a 6' wide easement behind the portion of the preserve abutting the amenity center tract to allow for the double row of shrubs that will be required as part of the 'D' buffer if and where parking areas for the amenity center face Santa Barbara Blvd. If multi-family residential is developed north of the amenity center tract and parking is proposed for the multi-family units between the preserve and the building, the double row of shrubs will be required there as well. Otherwise, please request a deviation and provide supporting documentation and photos to verify that the double row hedge is not necessary.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/14/2018

If a deviation is not requested to remove the buffer where the preserve is shown along the North, please add the note that the preserve meets the buffer requirements after removal of exotics or supplemental planting will be provided to meet buffer requirements and provide the 6' wide easement behind the preserve to accomodate the hedge that is required as part of the 'B' buffer.

2 Re-Submittal      Status: Returned for Correction
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 06/26/2018 06/25/2018
Annis Moxam ((239) 252-5519)   Send Email
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 06/26/2018 06/20/2018
Sue Faulkner ((239) 252-5715)   Send Email
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 06/26/2018 06/26/2018
Craig Brown ((239) 252-2548)   Send Email
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Resolved
06/25/2018

Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): a. Please provide the credentials for the person that prepared the Environmental Data report. b. Please revise the FLUCCS map (Pg 2) and Native Habitat exhibit (Pg 3) there are areas shown on the Native map that are not included in the FLUCCS Map, Please clarify. c. Please revise the FLUCCS Map to include native vegetation. The area shown as 212 has existing native vegetation as shown on the Native Habitat map, provide a FLUCCS for the existing vegetation. The area labeled as FLUCCS 111 has vegetation present around the existing home please update revise the FLUCCS for this area. d. Please provide a tree survey of the area labeled as FLUCCS 212. If the trees present meet the LDC requirement (3.05.07.A.2) they should be included as part of the existing native vegetation calculations. e. Please revise the description of the preserve areas being in two separate locations. The sentence states a variance will be needed please change "variance" to the word "deviation". (First sentences of Page 8 of the Environmental Data report). f. Please clarify the native acreage are correct; Table 2, Page 8 of the environmental data report states 14.42 Acres of native vegetation exists, however the Native Habitat map shows 12.72 acres. g. Please provide a map illustrating the location of existing preserve areas on adjacent properties. h. Please provide a map illustrating the existing ST overly areas and the proposed preserve areas. i. The environmental data 3.4 Native Habitat (page 7) describes the clearing that has taken place on the property. Please provide more information and clarify. A 1989 grandfather date was referenced, please clarify; are you referring to a specific LDC section? Provide historic aerials in report. j. The mowing of understory in the pasture areas was described as no longer subject to native vegetation calculations per discussions with Staff please provide documentation
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/25/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections Deviation 6 the request for a non-contiguous preserve areas needs more information and justification for the request.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Withdrawn
06/25/2018

Please provide information regarding the following: For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

Please provide a tree survey of the area labeled as FLUCCS 212. This area is labeled as #1 on the Environmental Data exhibit Native Habitat. If the trees present meet the LDC requirement (Density and size) (3.05.07.A.2) they should be included as part of the existing native vegetation calculations.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

Please revise the Native Habitat Exhibit (Environmental Data). Please clarify if the existing vegetation (shown as Area 2) present is native and should be included as discussed with ES Staff during the meeting for this project.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

The Master Concept Plan note 3; this note will need to be revised. Staff is currently in discussions regarding what the revised wording will be. Please contact Staff for the updated revised wording for this note.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

Revise Exhibit A. (page 2 0f 12) Please add the following wording as a clarifying statement just under the words "Allowable Uses:" "Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves." Or wording that refers to the LDC for allowable uses.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

The MCP indicates with shading that a portion of the northward preserve is going to be replanted. Its not clear what the size of this restoration area will be. Please clarify.
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 06/26/2018 05/29/2018
Thomas Mastroberto ((239) 252-7348)   Send Email
Public Utilities - PUED Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 06/26/2018 06/26/2018
Eric Fey ((239) 252-1037)   Send Email
2.10 Utility Provisions
Resolved
06/26/2018

4/19/2018: On the Statement of Utility Provisions form, the total population to be served is miscalculated and should be 575 rather than 560. Recalculate all flows based on the correct population, and put the correct values in the appropriate blanks. (The wastewater flows were switched.)
2.10 Utility Provisions
Resolved
06/26/2018

4/19/2018: Your responses to several evaluation criteria state that water and sewer infrastructure is available at or near the property to serve the proposed community, but significant main extensions would be required to establish County water and sewer service. Please revise these responses to be more realistic.
2.1 Water Connection Point
Resolved
06/26/2018

4/19/2018: Add a commitment to construct an 8" water main along the project's frontage on Santa Barbara Blvd or longitudinally through the property, connecting one end to the County's water distribution system and providing a stub-out for future connection at the other end.
School District Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 06/26/2018 06/26/2018
James Sabo ((239) 252-2708)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

A school district review was requested from Collier County Public Schools. A review comment response has not yet been provided, but may be forthcoming.
Transportation Pathways Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 06/26/2018 06/26/2018
Michael Sawyer ((239) 252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments- Transportation Pathways Review
Resolved
06/26/2018

Additional Comments- Transportation Pathways Review: Rev.1: Please note sidewalks on both sides of the roadways will be required on Cope Lane and Sunset Boulevard extension. Please show both on the master plan.
Transportation Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 06/26/2018 06/26/2018
Michael Sawyer ((239) 252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.2: Please see review 1 comment below. Interconnection has not been provided. Rev.1: Please revise master plan to accommodate the interconnection with Taormina Reserve PUD to the north as briefly discussed at the pre app meeting. This includes 60 foot total ROW for Sunset Boulevard Extension with sidewalks on both sides of the public access road. Please show this extension on the master plan and provide a developer commitment.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.2: Commitment provided for Cope Lane, thank you. Please revise commitment to indicate construction will simply be to county standards. Rev.1: Please show the construction of Cope Lane to intersection with Sunset Boulevard noted in review one comment above. This should also be noted as a developer commitment.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Resolved
06/26/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Provide a developer commitment to provide fair share payment for a potential future signalization of Cope Lane and Santa Barbara when/if warrants are meet.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.2: Commitment provided, thank you; however it does not contain current required language. Please add….”based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval.” Rev.1: Provide developer commitment for standard trip limit consistent with TIS.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Resolved
06/26/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: TIS comments-corrections. 1. Table 2C: The higher volume (Per Growth Rate Method from Table 2B) was not used to come up with the 2023 Build-out Peak Direction volumes. 2. The 2023 Build-Out Peak Hour Peak Direction LOS was not shown correctly on Table 2C. The background level of service, according to the Collier County 2017 AUIR spreadsheet is: Davis Boulevard from County Barn Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard – LOS C Davis Boulevard from Santa Barbara Boulevard to Radio Road – LOS B Rattlesnake Hammock Road from County Barn Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard – LOS B Rattlesnake Hammock Road from Santa Barbara Boulevard to Collier Boulevard – LOS B Santa Barbara Boulevard from Radio Road to Davis Boulevard – LOS B Santa Barbara Boulevard from Davis Boulevard to Site – LOS B 3. A turn-lane analysis should be conducted to verify that the lengths of the existing turn lanes are sufficient.
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 06/26/2018 06/26/2018
James Sabo ((239) 252-2708)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/26/2018

There is information missing from the Property Ownership Disclosure form. Please complete letter G. on the form and provide the required information.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/26/2018

There is a signature on the Property Ownership Disclosure form by James R. Schier, VP. Please identify the signature and how they are connected to the project or application.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/26/2018

The names of the agents for the for the project have not been included on the application form. Please correct and add agent names to the application form.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/26/2018

There is not a signed affidavit of authorization by the property owners granting authority to the contract purchaser to act on the requrest in the application. Please provide signed affidavits of authorization from the property owners to the contract purchaser.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

There have been sign deviations requested. They will be reviewed. Should you have any additional sign deviation requests. Please include them in the response letter. Not Resolved: Diana Compagnone comments here: Deviation 1, Please porvide a timeframe that can be measured versus a percentage of sales. For example, through December 2020. Deviation 2, Resolved. Deviation 3, The incorrect code was provided. Please correct the code to 5.06.02 B.14, the deviation requested is nearly 400% greater than is allowed by code. The deviation appears too large for a boundary marker.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/26/2018

For Exhibit F. Developer Commitments; there is not a commitment listed for P.M. Peak Traffic maximum number of trips. Please change and correct the Developer Commitments to include a commitment for P.M. Peak Traffic maximum number of trips.
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 06/26/2018 06/26/2018
Heidi Ashton-Cicko ((239) 252-8773)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/26/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please provide names of owners of Cross and Thompson, LLC. for BCC and CCPC conflicts checks.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/26/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please provide names of owners of Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC. for BCC and CCPC conflicts checks.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: According to the survey, Sunset Boulevard bisects this proposed PUD. Please explain why this roadway is removed from the PUD master plan? And please demonstrate that no one has a right of access through this roadway? [6-22-18 no title information was provided]
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: See comments and changes dated 6-26-18 on the proposed PUD document, to be provided by the County planner.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/26/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: For staff: Please provide the county surveyor with the survey and Exhibit D (legal description) and have him verify that the legal description is correct.
Landscape Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 07/19/2018 06/25/2018
Mark Templeton ((239) 252-2475)   Send Email
4.06.02 Perimeter landscape buffers
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

4.06.02. Provide perimeter landscape buffers. See also LDC section 4.06.02 C, Table 2.4. Buffers are required per code even where they abut preserves on the adjacent parcel. Please remove the phrase "no buffer required" and label these as Type 'B' buffers. Alternatively, deviations may be requested to reduce or remove these buffers. If deviations from the code required buffers are requested, please provide supporting documentation and photos as part of the justification.
4.06.02 Perimeter landscape buffers
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

4.06.02. Provide perimeter landscape buffers. See also LDC section 4.06.02 C, Table 2.4. For the preserve adjacent to Santa Barbara Blvd, please add the note that the preserve meets buffer requirements after removal of exotics or supplemental planting will be provided to meet buffer requirements. Please provide a 6' wide easement behind the portion of the preserve abutting the amenity center tract to allow for the double row of shrubs that will be required as part of the 'D' buffer if and where parking areas for the amenity center face Santa Barbara Blvd. If multi-family residential is developed north of the amenity center tract and parking is proposed for the multi-family units between the preserve and the building, the double row of shrubs will be required there as well. Otherwise, please request a deviation and provide supporting documentation and photos to verify that the double row hedge is not necessary.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/18/2018

If a deviation is not requested to remove the buffer where the preserve is shown along the North, please add the note that the preserve meets the buffer requirements after removal of exotics or supplemental planting will be provided to meet buffer requirements and provide the 6' wide easement behind the preserve to accomodate the hedge that is required as part of the 'B' buffer.

1 Initial Submittal      Status: Returned for Correction
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 04/18/2018 04/13/2018
Annis Moxam ((239) 252-5519)   Send Email
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 04/18/2018 04/18/2018
Sue Faulkner ((239) 252-5715)   Send Email
Emergency Management Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 04/18/2018 04/19/2018
Dan Summers ((239) 252-8000)   Send Email
Engineering Stormwater Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 04/18/2018 04/10/2018
Richard Orth ((239) 252-5092)   Send Email
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 04/18/2018 04/18/2018
Craig Brown ((239) 252-2548)   Send Email
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): a. Please provide the credentials for the person that prepared the Environmental Data report. b. Please revise the FLUCCS map (Pg 2) and Native Habitat exhibit (Pg 3) there are areas shown on the Native map that are not included in the FLUCCS Map, Please clarify. c. Please revise the FLUCCS Map to include native vegetation. The area shown as 212 has existing native vegetation as shown on the Native Habitat map, provide a FLUCCS for the existing vegetation. The area labeled as FLUCCS 111 has vegetation present around the existing home please update revise the FLUCCS for this area. d. Please provide a tree survey of the area labeled as FLUCCS 212. If the trees present meet the LDC requirement (3.05.07.A.2) they should be included as part of the existing native vegetation calculations. e. Please revise the description of the preserve areas being in two separate locations. The sentence states a variance will be needed please change "variance" to the word "deviation". (First sentences of Page 8 of the Environmental Data report). f. Please clarify the native acreage are correct; Table 2, Page 8 of the environmental data report states 14.42 Acres of native vegetation exists, however the Native Habitat map shows 12.72 acres. g. Please provide a map illustrating the location of existing preserve areas on adjacent properties. h. Please provide a map illustrating the existing ST overly areas and the proposed preserve areas. i. The environmental data 3.4 Native Habitat (page 7) describes the clearing that has taken place on the property. Please provide more information and clarify. A 1989 grandfather date was referenced, please clarify; are you referring to a specific LDC section? Provide historic aerials in report. j. The mowing of understory in the pasture areas was described as no longer subject to native vegetation calculations per discussions with Staff please provide documentation
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Withdrawn
04/18/2018

Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Please revise the FLUCCS map (Pg 2) and Native Habitat exhibit (Pg 3) there are areas shown on the Native map that are not included in the FLUCCS Map, Please clarify.
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Withdrawn
04/18/2018

Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Please revise the FLUCCS Map to include native vegetation. The area shown as 212 has existing native vegetation as shown on the Native Habitat map, provide a FLUCCS for the existing vegetation. The area labeled as FLUCCS 111 has vegetation present around the existing home please update revise the FLUCCS for this area.
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Withdrawn
04/18/2018

Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Please provide a tree survey of the area labeled as FLUCCS 212 If the trees present meet the LDC requirement they should be included as part of the existing native vegetation calculations.
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Withdrawn
04/18/2018

Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Please revise the description of the preserve areas being in two separate locations. The sentence states a variance will be needed please change variance to the work deviation. (First sentences of Page 8 of the Environmental Data report). Please clarify the native acreage are correct Table 2 Page 8 of the environmental data report states 14.42 Acres of native vegetation exists, however the Native Habitat map shows 12.72 acres?
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Withdrawn
04/18/2018

Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Please provide a map illustrating the location of existing preserve areas on adjacent properties.
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Withdrawn
04/18/2018

Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Please provide a map illustrating the existing ST overly areas and the proposed preserve areas.
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Withdrawn
04/18/2018

Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): The environment data 3.4 Native Habitat (page 7) describes the clearing that has taken place on the property. Please provide more information and clarify: a 1989 grandfather date was reference please clarify The mowing of understory in the pasture areas was described as no longer subject to native vegetation calculations per discussions with Staff please provide documentation.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections Deviation 6 the request for a non-contiguous preserve areas needs more information and justification for the request.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Please provide information regarding the following: For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 04/18/2018 03/22/2018
Thomas Mastroberto ((239) 252-7348)   Send Email
Graphics - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 04/18/2018 04/10/2018
Beth Yang ((239) 252-6208)   Send Email
Historical Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 04/18/2018 03/22/2018
Ray Bellows ((239) 252-2463)   Send Email
Parks and Rec Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 04/18/2018 04/03/2018
David Berra   Send Email
Public Utilities - PUED Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 04/18/2018 04/19/2018
Eric Fey ((239) 252-1037)   Send Email
2.10 Utility Provisions
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

4/19/2018: On the Statement of Utility Provisions form, the total population to be served is miscalculated and should be 575 rather than 560. Recalculate all flows based on the correct population, and put the correct values in the appropriate blanks. (The wastewater flows were switched.)
2.10 Utility Provisions
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

4/19/2018: Your responses to several evaluation criteria state that water and sewer infrastructure is available at or near the property to serve the proposed community, but significant main extensions would be required to establish County water and sewer service. Please revise these responses to be more realistic.
2.1 Water Connection Point
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

4/19/2018: Add a commitment to construct an 8" water main along the project's frontage on Santa Barbara Blvd or longitudinally through the property, connecting one end to the County's water distribution system and providing a stub-out for future connection at the other end.
School District Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 04/18/2018 04/18/2018
James Sabo ((239) 252-2708)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

A school district review was requested from Collier County Public Schools. A review comment response has not yet been provided, but may be forthcoming.
Transportation Pathways Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 04/18/2018 04/18/2018
Michael Sawyer ((239) 252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments- Transportation Pathways Review
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Additional Comments- Transportation Pathways Review: Rev.1: Please note sidewalks on both sides of the roadways will be required on Cope Lane and Sunset Boulevard extension. Please show both on the master plan.
Transportation Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 04/18/2018 04/18/2018
Michael Sawyer ((239) 252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Please revise master plan to accommodate the interconnection with Taormina Reserve PUD to the north as briefly discussed at the pre app meeting. This includes 60 foot total ROW for Sunset Boulevard Extension with sidewalks on both sides of the public access road. Please show this extension on the master plan and provide a developer commitment.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Please show the construction of Cope Lane to intersection with Sunset Boulevard noted in review one comment above. This should also be noted as a developer commitment.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Provide a developer commitment to provide fair share payment for a potential future signalization of Cope Lane and Santa Barbara when/if warrants are meet.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Provide developer commitment for standard trip limit consistent with TIS.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: TIS comments-corrections. 1. Table 2C: The higher volume (Per Growth Rate Method from Table 2B) was not used to come up with the 2023 Build-out Peak Direction volumes. 2. The 2023 Build-Out Peak Hour Peak Direction LOS was not shown correctly on Table 2C. The background level of service, according to the Collier County 2017 AUIR spreadsheet is: Davis Boulevard from County Barn Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard – LOS C Davis Boulevard from Santa Barbara Boulevard to Radio Road – LOS B Rattlesnake Hammock Road from County Barn Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard – LOS B Rattlesnake Hammock Road from Santa Barbara Boulevard to Collier Boulevard – LOS B Santa Barbara Boulevard from Radio Road to Davis Boulevard – LOS B Santa Barbara Boulevard from Davis Boulevard to Site – LOS B 3. A turn-lane analysis should be conducted to verify that the lengths of the existing turn lanes are sufficient.
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 04/18/2018 04/18/2018
James Sabo ((239) 252-2708)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

There is information missing from the Property Ownership Disclosure form. Please complete letter G. on the form and provide the required information.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

There is a signature on the Property Ownership Disclosure form by James R. Schier, VP. Please identify the signature and how they are connected to the project or application.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

The names of the agents for the for the project have not been included on the application form. Please correct and add agent names to the application form.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

There is not a signed affidavit of authorization by the property owners granting authority to the contract purchaser to act on the requrest in the application. Please provide signed affidavits of authorization from the property owners to the contract purchaser.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

There have been sign deviations requested. They will be reviewed. Should you have any additional sign deviation requests. Please include them in the response letter.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

For Exhibit F. Developer Commitments; there is not a commitment listed for P.M. Peak Traffic maximum number of trips. Please change and correct the Developer Commitments to include a commitment for P.M. Peak Traffic maximum number of trips.
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 04/18/2018 04/12/2018
Heidi Ashton-Cicko ((239) 252-8773)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please provide names of owners of Cross and Thompson, LLC. for BCC and CCPC conflicts checks.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please provide names of owners of Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC. for BCC and CCPC conflicts checks.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: According to the survey, Sunset Boulevard bisects this proposed PUD. Please explain why this roadway is removed from the PUD master plan? And please demonstrate that no one has a right of access through this roadway?
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: See comments and changes dated 4-12-18 on the proposed PUD document, to be provided by the planner.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/29/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: For staff: Please provide the county surveyor with the survey and Exhibit D (legal description) and have him verify that the legal description is correct.
Landscape Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 04/18/2018 04/18/2018
Mark Templeton ((239) 252-2475)   Send Email
GIS Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 04/18/2018 04/13/2018
William Fowler   Send Email

Fees
Paid Fees Amount Paid Owing Date Paid
Pre-application Meeting $500.00 $500.00 Paid 01/10/2018
TIS Major Study Review $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Paid 03/21/2018
TIS Methodology Review $500.00 $500.00 Paid 03/21/2018
Environmental Impact Statement Base fee $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Paid 03/21/2018
Comp Planning Review - Planned Unit Development $2,250.00 $2,250.00 Paid 03/21/2018
Planned Unit Development $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Paid 03/21/2018
Site Area (Acreage) fee $823.00 $823.00 Paid 03/21/2018
Fire Code Review - Planned Unit Development $150.00 $150.00 Paid 03/21/2018
Legal Advertising Fee $1,125.00 $1,125.00 Paid 03/21/2018
Legal Advertising Fee (BCC) $500.00 $500.00 Paid 03/21/2018
Graphics Property Notification Address Listing $85.00 $85.00 Paid 03/30/2018
Outstanding Fees Amount Paid Owing Date Paid
No outstanding fees.


Your project will not be reviewed until all fees are paid in full.

Deposits & Bonds

There are no deposits or bonds for this planning application.

Inspections

There are no inspections for this planning application.

Documents & Images
Date Uploaded File Type Document Name
01/10/2018 Receipt Receipt for transaction: 2018-002487
01/10/2018 Letter PL Payment Slip
01/11/2018 Pre-App Notes Pre App Notes.pdf
01/22/2018 Pre-App Notes Pre App Note pt. 2.pdf
03/22/2018 Applications Cover Letter/Narrative Statement (Submittal 1 01 Cover Ltr 03-05-2018 - Prepared.pdf)
07/18/2018 Document Submittal 3 Deviation Justification
03/05/2018 Document Submittal 1 - Property Owners List
07/19/2018 Legal Document Affidavit of Authorization/Evidence of Authority (Submittal 1 08 Affidavit of Authorization - Prepared.pdf)
03/05/2018 Approved Plan Submittal 1 - Survey
06/20/2018 Applications Application Form (Submittal 2 02 Application PUDRezone-rev1 - Prepared.pdf)
03/05/2018 Checklist Submittal 1 - Addressing Checklist
03/22/2018 Photograph Aerial Photographs (Submittal 1 14 Aerial Loc Map - Prepared.pdf)
03/05/2018 Pre-App Notes Submittal 1 - Pre-App Notes
07/18/2018 Document Submittal 3 Environmental Supplement 07-10-2018
07/19/2018 Markupable Property Ownership Disclosure Form (Submittal 2 09 PropertyOwnerDisclosure-rev1 - Prepared.pdf)
09/05/2018 Legal Document Exhibits A-F (Russell Square RPUD ExhA-F-v6 - Prepared.pdf)
03/05/2018 Document Submittal 1 - Historical Archeological Survey
03/05/2018 Document Submittal 1 - School Impact Analysis
03/05/2018 Submittal 1 - Evaluation Criteria
03/05/2018 Letter (Submittal) Submittal 1 - Warranty Deed
05/29/2018 Document Submittal 2 16 TIS 5-17-2018
03/05/2018 Document Submittal 1 - Statement of Utility Provision
03/05/2018 Document Submittal 1 - Legal Desciption
03/05/2018 Legal Document Submittal 1 - Covenant of Unified Control
03/06/2018 Letter PL Payment Slip
03/21/2018 Receipt Receipt for transaction: 2018-023789
03/21/2018 Letter RLS
03/29/2018 Letter PL Payment Slip
03/30/2018 Receipt Receipt for transaction: 2018-027025
04/18/2018 RE Confirm Legal for apps.msg
04/18/2018 Letter Comp Planning Consistency Review 1.pdf
04/19/2018 Title - 041818.doc
04/19/2018 Letter Review Comment Letter
04/26/2018 Legal Draft RLS Closed(656).pdf
07/18/2018 Document Submittal 3 Response Letter
05/29/2018 Submittal 2 02a Applicant Agent Information-rev1
05/29/2018 Submittal 2 05 Evaluation Criteria-rev1
05/29/2018 Letter RLS
06/20/2018 Letter Comp Planning Consistency R2.pdf
06/29/2018 Letter Review Comment Letter
07/18/2018 Submittal 3 REV F COMMIT CROSS-NEAL 6719489
07/18/2018 Submittal 3 Evaluation Criteria
07/18/2018 Submittal 3 Quit Claim Deed
07/18/2018 Letter RLS
07/20/2018 Letter Comp Planning Consistency R3.pdf
08/24/2018 E-mails Submittal 3 - Email from Planner (Version Over Doc. request)
Submittals | Portal Home
Powered by CityView