GMD Public Portal

City Logo

Links

Address

Growth Management
Division - Planning
and Regulation
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104

Inspections:
(239) 252-2406
Permit Cancellations
Permit Extensions:
(239) 252-2493
E-Permitting:
(239) 252-2332
Permit Issuance:
(239) 252-2428
E-Planning:
(239) 252-1036
Floodplain Hotline:
(239) 252-2942
Code Enforcement:
(239) 252-2440
Contractor's Licensing:
(239) 252-2431
Other:
(239) 252-2400

Planning Application Status



 / 

Note: You can collapse and expand individual sections by clicking the header of the section you wish to collapse/expand.

Summary
PL20160002306
Pine Ridge Commons PUD (PUDA)
Pre-Application Meeting (Status: Complete - Add Application Type)
Planned Unit Development Amendment (Status: Hearing Held - Closed for Uploads)
Hearing Held - Closed for Uploads
09/06/2016
TRAIL BOULEVARD LLLP
paulabrethauer 02/08/2017 11:39 AM - PUDA - The amendment will provide for a maximum of 400 dwelling units to be permitted within the entirety of the 31± acre PUD.
Locations
Property
240280606

Property
240280703

Property
240280800

Property
240281003

Property
240283001

Property
240286008

Property
240287007

Property
240280101

Application Types (Click to See Reviews)
Pre-Application Meeting
Complete - Add Application Type
Planned Unit Development Amendment
Planning Commission & Board of Commissioners
Hearing Held - Closed for Uploads
6 Re-Submittal (MINOR/CLEAN UP)      Status: Accepted
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/26/2018 03/21/2018
Annis Moxam ((239) 252-5519)   Send Email
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/26/2018 04/23/2018
Marcia Kendall ((239) 252-2387)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
04/23/2018

• Statement of Compliance, Paragraph 4: Revise the policy number reference from the proposed 3.1.e and f to 3.2.e. and f. Per previous request the letters have been changed but not the policy number – please change from 3.1 to 3.2. (This omitted change appears to be an oversight.)
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/26/2018 03/20/2018
Linda Simmons ((239) 252-2311)   Send Email
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/26/2018 03/20/2018
Timothy Finn ((239) 252-4312)   Send Email
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/26/2018 03/28/2018
Heidi Ashton-Cicko ((239) 252-8773)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
03/28/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make the changes per my 3-8-18 comments, to be provided by the planner.
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/26/2018 03/20/2018
Summer Araque ((239) 252-6290)   Send Email

5 Re-Submittal (MINOR)      Status: Returned for Correction
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/13/2018 03/07/2018
Annis Moxam ((239) 252-5519)   Send Email
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/13/2018 03/12/2018
Marcia Kendall ((239) 252-2387)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
03/12/2018

GMPA must be approved ahead of PUDA in order to be consistent. The PUDA Ordinance needs to contain an effective date limited to the effective date of the companion GMPA. Also, some revisions to the PUD document are requested as noted under “Review of PUD Documents”.
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/13/2018 03/09/2018
Summer Araque ((239) 252-6290)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
03/09/2018

AGREEING TO DISAGREE. THE FOLLOWING WILL BE A STIPULATION IN THE STAFF REPORT (see Conditions tab). REPEAT COMMENT (third time) Email sent 3-8-2018: I have rejected your petition several times now for the same comment. In the future, please call me to discuss so we can minimize resubmittals. I have discussed with Matt and David Weeks. We are continuing to request that the PUD document indicate the actual preserve requirements. I understand that the GMPA language will allow the PUD to continue to provide the 15%. However, this needs to be memorialized somewhere. I discussed with David Weeks and we agreed that level of detail does not need to go into the GMPA, but the PUD environmental commitment. The language I have provided below (and in the past 2 review letters) is not exactly what needs to be used. However, it needs to capture the basic information. You can add something such as “The GMPA Ord. ##-## allows the 15% preservation (1.47 acres) to continue to be the minimum requirement.” This is subject to revision by Heidi. Language requested in review letter: The PUD Preserve requirement of 1.47 acres was calculated with the Pine Ridge Commons Site Development Plan, that included the preserve calculation for the entire PUD. The 1.47 acres of required preservation was based off the commercial development preservation standard of fifteen (15) percent of the existing native vegetation. With the proposed addition of residential use to the PUD, a preservation standard of twenty-five (25) percent would be required. The PUD will continue to provide 15% preservation as identified on the master concept plan. Alternate language which refer to GMPA: The PUD Preserve requirement of 1.47 acres was calculated with the Pine Ridge Commons Site Development Plan, that included the preserve calculation for the entire PUD. The 1.47 acres of required preservation was based off the commercial development preservation standard of fifteen (15) percent of the existing native vegetation. With the proposed addition of residential use to the PUD, a preservation standard of twenty-five (25) percent would be required. The GMPA Ord. ##-## allows the 15% preservation (1.47 acres) to continue to be the minimum requirement.
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/13/2018 02/20/2018
Margarita Acevedo ((239) 252-2309)   Send Email
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/13/2018 03/07/2018
Timothy Finn ((239) 252-4312)   Send Email
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 03/13/2018 03/13/2018
Heidi Ashton-Cicko ((239) 252-8773)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
03/13/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Based on the number of changes to the PUD document and recent comments from the CCPC, please provide the entire PUD document with strike-thru's and underlines for changed text. As of 2-2-18, there is still missing text.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
03/13/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make changes per my comments dated October 26, 2017, to be provided by the planner. As of 2-2-18, there are still outstanding comments.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
03/13/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make the changes per my 2-2-18 comments, to be provided by the planner. These are the same comments as my October 26, 2017 review and a few typos.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
03/19/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make the changes per my 3-8-18 comments, to be provided by the planner.

4 Re-Submittal      Status: Returned for Correction
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 02/12/2018 02/07/2018
Annis Moxam ((239) 252-5519)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
02/07/2018

Please add street names Pather Lane and Premier Way to Exhibit A - PUD Master Plan
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 02/12/2018 02/01/2018
Sue Faulkner ((239) 252-5715)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
02/20/2018

GMPA must be approved ahead of PUDA in order to be consistent. The PUDA Ordinance needs to contain an effective date limited to the effective date of the companion GMPA. Also, some revisions to the PUD document are requested as noted under “Review of PUD Documents”.
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 02/12/2018 02/12/2018
Summer Araque ((239) 252-6290)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
02/20/2018

REPEAT COMMENT - Revise PUD document to address the preserve requirement. Include the following Environmental Commitment: The PUD Preserve requirement of 1.47 acres was calculated with the Pine Ridge Commons Site Development Plan, that included the preserve calculation for the entire PUD. The 1.47 acres of required preservation was based off the commercial development preservation standard of fifteen (15) percent of the existing native vegetation. With the proposed addition of residential use to the PUD, a preservation standard of twenty-five (25) percent would be required. The PUD will continue to provide 15% preservation as identified on the master concept plan.
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 02/12/2018 02/02/2018
Linda Simmons ((239) 252-2311)   Send Email
Transportation Planning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 02/12/2018 02/12/2018
Michael Sawyer ((239) 252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Resolved
02/12/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.3: Please include the residential vs. commercial square footage reduction with confirmation trip calculations in the TIS. Also revise the the language in PUD Section 3.2 to include a requirement to document tracking of the residential unit count and remaining commercial square footage with each SDP or Plat submittal and approval for this development. Also revise this language to remove allowed commercial square footage at time of SDP approval instead of residential unit CO. The tracking documentation must also be submitted to PUD monitoring at time of SDP submittal. Rev.2: There still appears to be an inconsistency between the PUD development Language and the TIS. Specifically PUD Section 2.2.C. and TIS Table 1, Table 2A, Table 2B, and Table 2C. The PUD indicates that existing retail and office development of 275,000 s.f. is retained plus 375 multi-family units. The TIS appears to show in Table 1 total retail and office development of 204,342 s.f. plus 375 multi-family apartment units. If the commercial development s.f total remains the same and this amendment adds 375 multi-family units then Tables 2A and 2B appear to be incorrect in that the base daily 2-way and PM Peak hour trips are the some or nearly the same. Please revise TIS and or PUD to be consistent regarding total commercial development amounts. Rev.1: Reference TIS, understanding that traffic counts are reduced with this request, please provide a standard distribution calc's and map to show where/how remaining trips will be distributed on the network for clarity. Please also note that the development is within the Northwest TCMA again for clarity.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Resolved
02/12/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.3: Please add "unadjusted" to the trip limit commitment. Rev.2: Second request to provide developer commitment to limit PM Peak hour trips consistent with TIS count. Please also note previous comment regarding inconsistent PUD and TIS development scenarios. Rev.1: Provide developer commitment to limit PM trips consistent with revised TIS counts provided.
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 02/12/2018 02/12/2018
Timothy Finn ((239) 252-4312)   Send Email
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 02/12/2018 02/02/2018
Heidi Ashton-Cicko ((239) 252-8773)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
02/20/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Based on the number of changes to the PUD document and recent comments from the CCPC, please provide the entire PUD document with strike-thru's and underlines for changed text. As of 2-2-18, there is still missing text.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Withdrawn
02/02/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make changes to the amended PUD text and master plan per comments to be provided by email on 7-21-17. Some of the changes were done.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
02/20/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make changes per my comments dated October 26, 2017, to be provided by the planner. As of 2-2-18, there are still outstanding comments.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
02/20/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make the changes per my 2-2-18 comments, to be provided by the planner. These are the same comments as my October 26, 2017 review and a few typos.

3 Re-Submittal      Status: Returned for Correction
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 10/26/2017 10/27/2017
Annis Moxam ((239) 252-5519)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
01/12/2018

Please add street names Pather Lane and Premier Way to Exhibit A - PUD Master Plan
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 10/26/2017 10/26/2017
Sue Faulkner ((239) 252-5715)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
01/12/2018

GMPA must be approved ahead of PUDA in order to be consistent. The PUDA Ordinance needs to contain an effective date limited to the effective date of the companion GMPA. Also, some revisions to the PUD document are requested as noted above.
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 10/26/2017 10/23/2017
Summer Araque ((239) 252-6290)   Send Email
LDC 3.05.07 H.1.f. Off-Site Native Vegetation Retention
Resolved
10/23/2017

The proposed off-site preserve requires a deviation. This PUD changing from a commercial PUD to a mixed-use PUD. Therefore, this falls under 3.05.07.H.1.f.d.: "Preserves less than one acre in size." Therefore, since the preserve requirement for this PUD is 1.47 acres, a deviation would be requried. Staff may not support the deviation or leave it up to the decision of the Planning Commission as the deviation would far exceed the proposed LDC amendment moving forward. Also, this site will now include residential which would have originally required a higher preserve requirement. Therefore, reducing the preserve onsite even further may not be supported.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
10/23/2017

Evalution Criteria e. states: "Usable open space will be provided within the PUD as required by the LDC for the commercial development. Native preservation areas have been previously designated and are provided consistent with Section 3.05 of the LDC." This is not correct. A portion of the previously provided preserve is proposed to go offsite. This request requires a deviation.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
01/12/2018

Revise PUD document to address the preserve requirement. The following is the suggested language Environmental Commitment: The PUD Preserve requirement of 1.47 acres was calculated with the Pine Ridge Commons Site Development Plan, that included the preserve calculation for the entire PUD. The 1.47 acres of required preservation was based off the commercial development preservation standard of fifteen (15) percent of the existing native vegetation. With the proposed addition of residential use to the PUD, a preservation standard of twenty-five (25) percent would be required. The PUD will continue to provide 15% preservation as identified on the master concept plan.
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 10/26/2017 09/29/2017
Linda Simmons ((239) 252-2311)   Send Email
Transportation Planning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 10/26/2017 10/26/2017
Michael Sawyer ((239) 252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
01/12/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.3: Please include the residential vs. commercial square footage reduction with confirmation trip calculations in the TIS. Also revise the the language in PUD Section 3.2 to include a requirement to document tracking of the residential unit count and remaining commercial square footage with each SDP or Plat submittal and approval for this development. Also revise this language to remove allowed commercial square footage at time of SDP approval instead of residential unit CO. The tracking documentation must also be submitted to PUD monitoring at time of SDP submittal. Rev.2: There still appears to be an inconsistency between the PUD development Language and the TIS. Specifically PUD Section 2.2.C. and TIS Table 1, Table 2A, Table 2B, and Table 2C. The PUD indicates that existing retail and office development of 275,000 s.f. is retained plus 375 multi-family units. The TIS appears to show in Table 1 total retail and office development of 204,342 s.f. plus 375 multi-family apartment units. If the commercial development s.f total remains the same and this amendment adds 375 multi-family units then Tables 2A and 2B appear to be incorrect in that the base daily 2-way and PM Peak hour trips are the some or nearly the same. Please revise TIS and or PUD to be consistent regarding total commercial development amounts. Rev.1: Reference TIS, understanding that traffic counts are reduced with this request, please provide a standard distribution calc's and map to show where/how remaining trips will be distributed on the network for clarity. Please also note that the development is within the Northwest TCMA again for clarity.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
01/12/2018

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.3: Please add "unadjusted" to the trip limit commitment. Rev.2: Second request to provide developer commitment to limit PM Peak hour trips consistent with TIS count. Please also note previous comment regarding inconsistent PUD and TIS development scenarios. Rev.1: Provide developer commitment to limit PM trips consistent with revised TIS counts provided.
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 10/26/2017 10/16/2017
Timothy Finn ((239) 252-4312)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
10/16/2017

If a deviation is required (and requested), it will have to be included in the PUD Document. Provide justifiction for the deviation on a separate document.
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 10/26/2017 10/26/2017
Heidi Ashton-Cicko ((239) 252-8773)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Withdrawn
10/26/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please send the word version of your amendment to me by email for preparation of the Ordinance. This was withdrawn in August review
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
01/12/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Base d on the number of changes to the PUD document and recent comments from the CCPC, please provide the entire PUD document with strike-thru's and underlines for changed text. As of 10-26-17, this was not done.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
01/12/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make changes to the amended PUD text and master plan per comments to be provided by email on 7-21-17. Some of the changes were done.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
01/12/2018

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make changes per my comments dated October 26, 2017, to be provided by the planner
School District Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 10/26/2017 10/16/2017
Timothy Finn ((239) 252-4312)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
10/16/2017

No comments have been recieved as of 10-16-17

2 Re-Submittal      Status: Returned for Correction
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 08/17/2017 08/17/2017
Annis Moxam ((239) 252-5519)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

Please add street names Pather Lane and Premier Way to Exhibit A - PUD Master Plan
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 08/17/2017 08/18/2017
Sue Faulkner ((239) 252-5715)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

GMPA must be approved ahead of PUDA in order to be consistent. The PUDA Ordinance needs to contain an effective date limited to the effective date of the companion GMPA. Also, some revisions to the PUD document are requested as noted above.
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 08/17/2017 08/17/2017
Summer Araque ((239) 252-6290)   Send Email
LDC 3.05.07 H.1. Preserve Label
Resolved
08/17/2017

As indicated on the preapp notes, clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as “Preserve” on all plans (LDC 3.05.07 H.1.) on the PUD Master Plan. Show all preserves that have been recorded, including the .47 acres in the "C(2)" area. Provide a backup document (Aerial with FLUCFCS) showing the preserve acreage requirement for the PUD has been met.
Admin. Ch. 3 G.1. AC#24. FLUCFCS Overlay and Vegetation Inventory
Resolved
08/17/2017

Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). Demonstrate that the 1.47 acres of required preserve areas have been set aside including the 0.47 acre Preserve recorded in the area shown as "C(2)" area.
LDC 3.05.07.B-D Preserve Calculation
Resolved
08/17/2017

Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the maximum amount and ratios permitted to be created on-site or mitigated off-site. Exclude vegetation located within existing utility, drainage, and access easements from the preserve calculations (LDC3.05.07 B. - D.). As indicated on the preapp notes, include the minimum preserve acreage required in the Environmental Commitments section. According to the SDP plans, the preserve requirement is as follows: 9.65 acres of existing native vegetation x 15% = 1.47 acres. These were provided in 3 areas: Area 1 – 0.95 acres; Area 2 – 0.47 acres; Area 3 – 0.05 acres. Area 3 noted “Native vegetation in this area to be replanted on site with future site development plan submittals.”
Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. PUD Master Plan Contents #4. PUD Minimum Acreage
Resolved
08/17/2017

As requested in the preapp notes, the PUD Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. PUD Master Plan Contents #4).
LDC 3.05.07 H.1.f. Off-Site Native Vegetation Retention
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

The proposed off-site preserve requires a deviation. This PUD changing from a commercial PUD to a mixed-use PUD. Therefore, this falls under 3.05.07.H.1.f.d.: "Preserves less than one acre in size." Therefore, since the preserve requirement for this PUD is 1.47 acres, a deviation would be requried. Staff may not support the deviation or leave it up to the decision of the Planning Commission as the deviation would far exceed the proposed LDC amendment moving forward. Also, this site will now include residential which would have originally required a higher preserve requirement. Therefore, reducing the preserve onsite even further may not be supported.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

Evalution Criteria e. states: "Usable open space will be provided within the PUD as required by the LDC for the commercial development. Native preservation areas have been previously designated and are provided consistent with Section 3.05 of the LDC." This is not correct. A portion of the previously provided preserve is proposed to go offsite. This request requires a deviation.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

Please will look into whether this PUD requires a 25% preserve. This questions has been posed by several staff members reviewing this petition.
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 08/17/2017 07/20/2017
Linda Simmons ((239) 252-2311)   Send Email
Transportation Planning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 08/17/2017 08/17/2017
Michael Sawyer ((239) 252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.2: There still appears to be an inconsistency between the PUD development Language and the TIS. Specifically PUD Section 2.2.C. and TIS Table 1, Table 2A, Table 2B, and Table 2C. The PUD indicates that existing retail and office development of 275,000 s.f. is retained plus 375 multi-family units. The TIS appears to show in Table 1 total retail and office development of 204,342 s.f. plus 375 multi-family apartment units. If the commercial development s.f total remains the same and this amendment adds 375 multi-family units then Tables 2A and 2B appear to be incorrect in that the base daily 2-way and PM Peak hour trips are the some or nearly the same. Please revise TIS and or PUD to be consistent regarding total commercial development amounts. Rev.1: Reference TIS, understanding that traffic counts are reduced with this request, please provide a standard distribution calc's and map to show where/how remaining trips will be distributed on the network for clarity. Please also note that the development is within the Northwest TCMA again for clarity.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Resolved
08/16/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Currently Collier Area Transit has a route that utilizes this development as a bus stop. Please confirm that this will continue in the future with this request.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.2: Second request to provide developer commitment to limit PM Peak hour trips consistent with TIS count. Please also note previous comment regarding inconsistent PUD and TIS development scenarios. Rev.1: Provide developer commitment to limit PM trips consistent with revised TIS counts provided.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Resolved
08/16/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Reference PUD Doc, section 2.15, Transportation: Please revise B-F to indicate these commitments are complete. As a suggestion consider using a note at the end of each "(Commitment Complete)".
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Resolved
08/16/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Please add the following to the transportation commitments for PUD monitoring: One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is XXXXX. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments.
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 08/17/2017 08/17/2017
Eric Johnson ((239) 252-2931)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/17/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections For clarity, please relabel the uses on the Master Plan. Example Residental (multi-family & Townhouse) R Office (Commercial uses - retail prohibited) O Commerical C
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/17/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please review comments below per Comp. Planning email. Dan - FYI, In addition to the FLUE consistency memo Sue is finalizing, I have 2 observations (that are not related to FLUE consistency so will not be in our memo) – just trying to be helpful: • thru-out Section II there are outdated LDC references (we will address LDC references in the Statement of Compliance since that is GMP-related); • appears to me that Sec. 2.17B. should be revised to add residential use and/or mixed use as it presently only addresses com’l uses. David Weeks
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/17/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Are there any intension on having residential above commercial (Mercato)?
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

If a deviation is required (and requested), it will have to be included in the PUD Document. Provide justifiction for the deviation on a separate document.
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 08/17/2017 08/17/2017
Heidi Ashton-Cicko ((239) 252-8773)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Withdrawn
08/17/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections: Affidavits of Unified Control: Please provide evidence that Barron Collier Management LLC is the authorized agent of Trail Boulevard LLLP. Please provide evidence that Barron Collier Management LLC is the authorized agent of Goodlette Pine Ridge II LLC.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Withdrawn
08/17/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections: Affidavits of Authorization: Please provide evidence that Barron Collier Management LLC is the authorized agent of Trail Boulevard LLLP. Please provide evidence that Barron Collier Management LLC is the authorized agent of Goodlette Pine Ridge II LLC.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please send the word version of your amendment to me by email for preparation of the Ordinance.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Withdrawn
08/17/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make changes to the amended PUD text and master plan per comments dated 3-2-17
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections: Base d on the number of changes to the PUD document and recent comments from the CCPC, please provide the entire PUD document with strike-thru's and underlines for changed text.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make changes to the amended PUD text and master plan per comments to be provided by email on 7-21-17
Landscape Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 08/17/2017 08/17/2017
Mark Templeton ((239) 252-2475)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
08/17/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please relable the buffers along the north and east property lines to read: If residential a 15' Type B buffer required. If Commercial, a 10' Type A buffer required. Please revise 2.18 of the PUD landscape language reflecting this and any code updates.
School District Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 08/25/2017 08/25/2017
Eric Johnson ((239) 252-2931)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
09/28/2017

Comments may be forthcoming.
Emergency Management Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 08/25/2017 08/25/2017
Dan Summers ((239) 252-8000)   Send Email

1 Initial Submittal      Status: Returned for Correction
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/09/2017 03/03/2017
Annis Moxam ((239) 252-5519)   Send Email
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 03/09/2017 03/09/2017
Sue Faulkner ((239) 252-5715)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

GMPA must be approved ahead of PUDA in order to be consistent.
Engineering Stormwater Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/09/2017 03/08/2017
Richard Orth ((239) 252-5092)   Send Email
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 03/09/2017 03/02/2017
Summer Araque ((239) 252-6290)   Send Email
LDC 3.05.07 H.1. Preserve Label
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

As indicated on the preapp notes, clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as “Preserve” on all plans (LDC 3.05.07 H.1.) on the PUD Master Plan. Show all preserves that have been recorded, including the .47 acres in the "C(2)" area. Provide a backup document (Aerial with FLUCFCS) showing the preserve acreage requirement for the PUD has been met.
Admin. Ch. 3 G.1. AC#24. FLUCFCS Overlay and Vegetation Inventory
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). Demonstrate that the 1.47 acres of required preserve areas have been set aside including the 0.47 acre Preserve recorded in the area shown as "C(2)" area.
LDC 3.05.07.B-D Preserve Calculation
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the maximum amount and ratios permitted to be created on-site or mitigated off-site. Exclude vegetation located within existing utility, drainage, and access easements from the preserve calculations (LDC3.05.07 B. - D.). As indicated on the preapp notes, include the minimum preserve acreage required in the Environmental Commitments section. According to the SDP plans, the preserve requirement is as follows: 9.65 acres of existing native vegetation x 15% = 1.47 acres. These were provided in 3 areas: Area 1 – 0.95 acres; Area 2 – 0.47 acres; Area 3 – 0.05 acres. Area 3 noted “Native vegetation in this area to be replanted on site with future site development plan submittals.”
Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. PUD Master Plan Contents #4. PUD Minimum Acreage
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

As requested in the preapp notes, the PUD Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. PUD Master Plan Contents #4).
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/09/2017 03/08/2017
Linda Simmons ((239) 252-2311)   Send Email
Graphics - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/09/2017 03/02/2017
LEGACY: Jessica Huckeba ((239) 252-2315)   Send Email
Historical Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/09/2017 02/10/2017
LEGACY: Rachel Beasley ((239) 252-8202)   Send Email
Parks and Rec Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/09/2017 03/08/2017
LEGACY: Vicky Ahmad ((239) 282-4047)   Send Email
Public Utilities - PUED Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/09/2017 03/09/2017
Eric Fey ((239) 252-1037)   Send Email
Transportation Pathways Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Approved 03/09/2017 03/09/2017
Michael Sawyer ((239) 252-2926)   Send Email
Transportation Planning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 03/09/2017 03/09/2017
Michael Sawyer ((239) 252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Reference TIS, understanding that traffic counts are reduced with this request, please provide a standard distribution calc's and map to show where/how remaining trips will be distributed on the network for clarity. Please also note that the development is within the Northwest TCMA again for clarity.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Currently Collier Area Transit has a route that utilizes this development as a bus stop. Please confirm that this will continue in the future with this request.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Provide developer commitment to limit PM trips consistent with revised TIS counts provided.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Reference PUD Doc, section 2.15, Transportation: Please revise B-F to indicate these commitments are complete. As a suggestion consider using a note at the end of each "(Commitment Complete)".
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Please add the following to the transportation commitments for PUD monitoring: One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is XXXXX. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments.
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 03/09/2017 03/10/2017
LEGACY: Daniel Smith ((239) 252-4312)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections For clarity, please relabel the uses on the Master Plan. Example Residental (multi-family & Townhouse) R Office (Commercial uses - retail prohibited) O Commerical C
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please review comments below per Comp. Planning email. Dan - FYI, In addition to the FLUE consistency memo Sue is finalizing, I have 2 observations (that are not related to FLUE consistency so will not be in our memo) – just trying to be helpful: • thru-out Section II there are outdated LDC references (we will address LDC references in the Statement of Compliance since that is GMP-related); • appears to me that Sec. 2.17B. should be revised to add residential use and/or mixed use as it presently only addresses com’l uses. David Weeks
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Are there any intension on having residential above commercial (Mercato)?
Miscellaneous Corrections
Withdrawn
03/10/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please include a concept exhibit as backup material on how the residential component is proposed in this PUD.
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 03/09/2017 03/02/2017
Heidi Ashton-Cicko ((239) 252-8773)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections: Affidavits of Unified Control: Please provide evidence that Barron Collier Management LLC is the authorized agent of Trail Boulevard LLLP. Please provide evidence that Barron Collier Management LLC is the authorized agent of Goodlette Pine Ridge II LLC.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections: Affidavits of Authorization: Please provide evidence that Barron Collier Management LLC is the authorized agent of Trail Boulevard LLLP. Please provide evidence that Barron Collier Management LLC is the authorized agent of Goodlette Pine Ridge II LLC.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please send the word version of your amendment to me by email for preparation of the Ordinance.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections: Please make changes to the amended PUD text and master plan per comments dated 3-2-17
Landscape Review Planned Unit Development Amendment Rejected 03/09/2017 03/10/2017
LEGACY: Daniel Smith ((239) 252-4312)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
07/20/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please relable the buffers along the north and east property lines to read: If residential a 15' Type B buffer required. If Commercial, a 10' Type A buffer required. Please revise 2.18 of the PUD landscape language reflecting this and any code updates.

Fees
Paid Fees Amount Paid Owing Date Paid
Pre-application Meeting $500.00 $500.00 Paid 09/28/2016
Comp Planning Review - PUDA $2,250.00 $2,250.00 Paid 02/08/2017
Planned Unit Development Amendment $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Paid 02/08/2017
Site Area (Acreage) fee $775.00 $775.00 Paid 02/08/2017
Fire Code Review - PUDA $125.00 $125.00 Paid 02/08/2017
Legal Advertising Fee $1,125.00 $1,125.00 Paid 02/08/2017
Legal Advertising Fee (BCC) $500.00 $500.00 Paid 02/08/2017
TIS Methodology Review $500.00 $500.00 Paid 02/08/2017
Graphics Property Notification Address Listing $85.00 $85.00 Paid 03/31/2017
5th and Subsequent Review (PUDA) $0.00 $0.00 Paid 02/20/2018
Property Owner Notifications $81.00 $81.00 Paid 10/09/2018
Outstanding Fees Amount Paid Owing Date Paid
No outstanding fees.


Your project will not be reviewed until all fees are paid in full.

Deposits & Bonds

There are no deposits or bonds for this planning application.

Inspections

There are no inspections for this planning application.

Documents & Images
Date Uploaded File Type Document Name
09/06/2016 Checklist Addressing Checklist
09/28/2016 Pre-App Notes pre-app notes
09/28/2016 Letter PL Payment Slip
09/28/2016 Receipt Receipt for transaction: 2016-063147
12/16/2016 2x3 Ad Map
02/08/2017 Applications Cover Letter/Narrative Statement (Submittal 1 01 PRC PUDA Cover Ltr 2017 - Prepared.pdf)
07/20/2017 Document Submittal 2 - Amending Element (PUD Revisions)
02/07/2017 Document Submittal 1 - Statement of Utility Provision
07/20/2017 Markupable Updated Master Plan (Submittal 2 Exhibit A-MCP 2017 rev2 - Prepared.pdf)
02/09/2017 Applications Application Form (Submittal 1 02 Application - PUDA - Prepared.pdf)
02/09/2017 Legal Document Affidavit of Authorization/Evidence of Authority (Submittal 1 04 Affidavit of Authorization - Prepared.pdf)
02/07/2017 Document Submittal 1 - PUD Ordinance and Development Commitment Information
02/09/2017 Photograph Aerial Photographs (Submittal 1 08 Aerial Photograph - Prepared.pdf)
02/07/2017 Letter (Submittal) Submittal 1 - Warranty Deed
02/09/2017 Legal Document Covenant of Unified Control (Submittal 1 05 Covenant Unified Control - Prepared.pdf)
07/20/2017 Document Submittal 2 - Traffic Impact Study (TIS)
02/07/2017 Document Submittal 1 - School Impact Analysis
02/09/2017 Legal Document Exhibits A-F (Submittal 1 Exhibits- PUDA - Prepared.pdf)
02/08/2017 Checklist Submittal 1 - Addressing Checklist
02/08/2017 Letter PL Payment Slip
02/08/2017 RLS #17-CPS-01645 Submittal 1 - RLS -Pine Ridge Commons PUD
02/08/2017 Receipt Receipt for transaction: 2017-008166
02/08/2017 Letter Check Overage Form
03/10/2017 Letter Insufficiency Letter (INSF)
03/31/2017 Letter PL Payment Slip
03/31/2017 Receipt Receipt for transaction: 2017-019763
04/13/2017 Scanned Images Affidavit of Compliance 04-10-2017.pdf
06/19/2017 Scanned Images Transcript Pine Ridge Commons NIM 042417.pdf
06/19/2017 Scanned Images Sign-in Sheets Pine Ridge Commons NIM 042417.pdf
03/16/2018 Document Submittal 6 - Response Letter
07/20/2017 Document Submittal 2 - Environmental Data Requirements (Preserve FLUCCS Map)
07/20/2017 Proposed Plan Submittal 2 - Conservation Easement Dedication
07/20/2017 Submittal 2 - Exhibit 4 Evaluation Criteria
07/20/2017 Submittal 2 - Management Agreements
07/20/2017 Letter Submittal 2 - RLS 17-CPS-01645
08/18/2017 Letter Provisional Comment Letter
08/23/2017 Title - 082117(2).docx
08/25/2017 Letter Review Comment Letter
03/16/2018 Document Submittal 6 - Proposed Revisions
09/28/2017 Document Submittal 3 - Preserve Management Plan
09/28/2017 Letter Submittal 3 - RLS 17-CPS-01645
10/27/2017 Letter Review Comment Letter
01/11/2018 Document Traffic Impact Study (TIS) (Submittal 4 TIS - 12-05-2017 R1-certified.pdf)
01/12/2018 Letter RLS
02/01/2018 Letter Comprehensive Planning's Consistency Review4.pdf
02/08/2018 Title - 020618.docx (2/8/18 agent reviewing this title)
02/13/2018 Letter Review Comment Letter
02/20/2018 Letter PL Payment Slip
03/19/2018 E-mails Submittal 6 - Email from Planner (Bellows - Fee waiver/Minor)
02/20/2018 Letter Submittal 5 - RLS #17-CPS-01645
04/23/2018 Letter PUDA-PL2016-2306 Pine Ridge Commons R6a.docx
03/13/2018 Letter Review Comment Letter
03/19/2018 Letter Submittal 6 - RLS #17-CPS-01645
03/20/2018 Letter PUDA-PL2016-2306 Pine Ridge Commons R6.pdf
04/19/2018 Letter Hearing Notice to Newspaper_CCPC
04/26/2018 Scanned Images AffidavitandSignPosting 04-25-2018.pdf
05/08/2018 Scanned Images Property Owner Letter.pdf
05/08/2018 Property Owner List.xlsx
05/21/2018 Letter NIM Notice_NDN_5.20.18.pdf
05/29/2018 Letter PL Payment Slip
06/06/2018 NIM Recording 06-05-2018.WMA
06/08/2018 Receipt BCC Ad Fee Receipt #2018510796.pdf
06/18/2018 Scanned Images NDN INVOICE CCPC May 17 2018 Pine Ridge Commons GMPA 20160002360 PUDA 20160002306.pdf
06/21/2018 Letter Letter of Objection dated June 14, 2018.pdf
07/02/2018 Title - 070218.pdf
07/02/2018 Title - 070218.docx
08/13/2018 Legal Draft Zoning Ordinance - PRC PUDA 7.25.18.pdf
08/13/2018 Letter BCC Ad Request Slip_signed.pdf
08/13/2018 Letter Hearing Notice to Newspaper_BCC.pdf
08/16/2018 Letter ND-2091745_Ad Proof_9.11.18_BCC.pdf
08/22/2018 Letter BCC Affidavit & Advertisement.pdf
09/13/2018 Ordinance 2018-43.pdf
09/18/2018 Letter RLS
10/09/2018 Receipt Receipt for transaction: 2018-091127
Submittals | Portal Home
Powered by CityView