GMD Public Portal

City Logo

Links

Address

Growth Management
Division - Planning
and Regulation
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104

Phone. (239) 252-2400

Planning Application Status



 / 

Note: You can collapse and expand individual sections by clicking the header of the section you wish to collapse/expand.

Summary
PL20160001985
Cleary RPUD
Pre-Application Meeting (Status: Submitted - Closed for Uploads)
Planned Unit Development Rezone (Status: Under Review - Closed for Uploads)
Under Review - Closed for Uploads
ROYAL PALM NURSERY
Proposed rezone from the "A" Zoning District to RPUD to allow for group housing for seniors and/or residential dwelling units.
08/10/2016
Application Types (Click to See Reviews)
Pre-Application Meeting
Submitted - Closed for Uploads
Planned Unit Development Rezone
Planning Commission & Board of Commissioners
Under Review - Closed for Uploads
3 Re-Submittal      Status: Accepted
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Pending 07/27/2017
Annis Moxam (239-252-5519)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
07/24/2017

Per maps there is a ROW (John Michael RD) along the Westerly property line. On Exhibit C Master Plan, the Northern portion of the ROW is not shown. The OR 1097 PG 2181 is for the Southern portion, please add the Northern portion of the ROW per OR Book 111 and Page 133 (for the portion not shown) or provide OR Book and Page where it was vacated. (2nd re-submittal had the ROW on exhibit C, the OR Book and Page was incorrect)
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 07/27/2017 07/21/2017
Corby Schmidt (239-252-2944)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
07/21/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections - This PUD proposes residential uses at a density of 7.23 DU/A (65 units/8.99 acres), recreational uses and open space. However, it has not been demonstrated how the site qualifies to exceed the maximum eligible density of 7.0 DU/A (63 units).
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
07/21/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections - Staff recommends the maximum density be reduced to 7.0 DU/A and dwelling unit count be reduced to 63 units – and PUD documents be revised throughout accordingly ? to achieve consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Pending 07/27/2017
Summer Araque (239-252-6290)   Send Email
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Resolved
07/26/2017

Provide the following in the Environmental Data report (LDC 3.08.00): b. WHO PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. f. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03
LDC 3.05.07 A. Preserve Selection
Outstanding
06/28/2017

Areas excluded from the native vegetation retention calculations will have to be field verified by County staff. Have the environmental consultant contact County staff (Stephen Lenberger, 239-252-2915) to arrange for a site visit of the subject property. The native vegetation retention (preserve) requirement referenced on the PUD master plan and in the PUD document, environmental data and evaluation criteria in the application may all have to be revised pending outcome of the site visit with staff.
Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. PUD Master Plan Contents #4. PUD Minimum Acreage
Outstanding
06/28/2017

Add the following environmental commitment to section 1 of Exhibit F of the PUD document. “The portion of the 30 foot ROW easement within the preserve will need to be vacated prior to final plat or SDP approval, whichever is applicable.”
LDC 10.02.13 A.2. PUD Unique Features
Outstanding
06/28/2017

PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13 A.2.) Specifically, a bear management plan will be required. Replace section 1.b of Exhibit F of the PUD document with the following: “A management plan for Florida black bear shall be submitted for review and approval at time of final plat or SDP for the project, whichever is applicable.” Delete the last sentence in Environmental commitment 1.a. Amend the second allowable use within the uses in the preserve section of the PUD document to read as follows. “Mitigation for environmental permitting.”
Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. PUD Master Plan Contents #4. PUD Minimum Acreage
Outstanding
06/28/2017

Amend Note number 3 on the PUD master plan to read as follows. “Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07.” Consult with the Principal Planner to verify which note shall be provided for this petition. An additional landscape buffer outside of the preseve may be requried due the amount of exotics within the preserve.
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 07/27/2017 06/29/2017
Thomas Mastroberto (239-252-7348)   Send Email
Transportation Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Pending 07/27/2017
Michael Sawyer (239-252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Outstanding
06/28/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.2: TIS updated to 2016 AUIR however appears Tables 2B and 2C contain incorrect traffic counts for Immokalee Road segment 43.1 (I-75 to Logan), please correct to be consistent with 2016 counts. Rev.1: As discussed please update TIS to include 2016 AUIR calc's, specifically page 5 (general AUIR references, 5.1 (Table 2B) and page 5.2 (Table 2C). The BCC approved the AUIR last month and because this petition will be at hearing in 2017 the TIS needs to be current. The change will only reflect notes/references and current calc's...not the conclusions of the TIS.
Developer Commitments
Outstanding
06/28/2017

Developer commitments made as a condition of zoning are not adequately addressed Rev.2: Adjacent access easment information provided with second submittal. A developer agreement is still required to limit trips for the proposed PUD consistent with TIS provided (85 PM peak our two-way trips). Rev.1: Please provide a developer commitment regarding the shared access for the development (and adjacent development) on Immokalee. Please provide timing of a required easement to accommodate the access on the adjacent parcel, the timing needs to be tied to SDP/Plat approval or possibly building CO.
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Pending 07/27/2017
Nancy Gundlach (239-252-2484)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
06/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Note 1 on the Development Standards should be 23' from the sidewalk.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
06/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections The Legal Description for Exhibit D Parcel 2 is different from the Legal Description on the Survey. Please reconcile.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
06/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Due to the number of exotics within the preserve, additional buffering is needed. Please show how the required Type B Landscape requirements will be met along the southern property line.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
06/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please specify one individual (not two) as the Managing Entity in the PUD Monitoring Commitment # 3.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
06/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please see attached red-lines to the PUD document.
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Pending 07/27/2017
Scott Stone (239-252-5740)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
07/24/2017

Provide a copy of the ROW Easement (OR 1097, PG 2181). Staff will need to confirm whether this ROW is permitted within the preserve area, per LDC. UPDATE 6/7/17--The legal description for the ROW easement that you added to the Master Plan in this submittal (OR 111, PG 129) appears to indicate that the easement is located on the EASTERLY 30 feet of the property, not the WESTERLY 30 feet.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
06/28/2017

See markups on PUD Document provided by separate e-mail by the assigned planner.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
07/24/2017

In your response to evluation criteria submitted with the second submittal, you indicate that you are entitled to 37 DUs because you calculated the allowance based on the parent parcel (9.25 acres) before the taking relating to the Immokalee Road expansion. Was the 0.25 acres taken in fee simple or as an easement? If fee simple, then you should not include that 0.25 acres in your dwelling unit calculation (i.e--it would be 36, not 37, dwelling units) Note--it appears that you changed the number at 36 in the PUD document, so perhaps you left the number 37 in your evaluation criteria responses by mistake?
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
07/24/2017

Please confirm that this will not require a GMP Amendment.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
07/24/2017

It does not appear that you included responses to the criteria for Rezones under LDC Section 10.02.08 F. Please provide a response to each of the enumerated criteria under that section.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
07/24/2017

It appears you includd the wrong OR Book and Page for the ROW easement along the westerly 30 feet of your property. OR 111, PG 133 contains the ROW easement along the western 30' (according to staff, based on the legal description in that document). Please add a label for that easement in the approrpriate location.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
07/24/2017

Both the ROW easement along the western property line (OR 111, PG 133) and the ROW easement along the west and southern property line (OR 1097, PG 2181) are merely "subject to" reservations in recorded conveyance documents. The real property conveyance in OR 111, PG 133 is "subject to the reservation of right of way easement in, upon, and under the westerly 30 feet...for possible future roadways, utilities and services for public use." Similar, the property conveyance in OR 1097, PG 2181 is "subject to the reservation of right of way easement in, upon, and under the westerly and southerly 30 feet....for possible future roadways, utilities and services for public use." As such, it is not clear that these easements were actually created, as the "subject to" language in both conveyance documents merely amounts to an "offer to dedicate" a ROW easement to the County. However, is there any evidence that the County has "accepted" the easement dedication through express or implied action? If not, then the County would not have an interest in the easement and therefore the "easements" would not require a vacation. This comments relates to your labels on the Master Plan that both state "to be vacated."
Miscellaneous Corrections
Outstanding
07/24/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections

2 Re-Submittal      Status: Returned for Correction
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 06/08/2017 06/01/2017
Annis Moxam (239-252-5519)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/01/2017

Per maps there is a ROW (John Michael RD) along the Westerly property line. On Exhibit C Master Plan, the Northern portion of the ROW is not shown. The OR 1097 PG 2181 is for the Southern portion, please add the Northern portion of the ROW and provide OR Book and Page (for the portion not shown).
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 06/08/2017 06/01/2017
Corby Schmidt (239-252-2944)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/01/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections - provided in separate document (included herein).
Engineering Stormwater Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 06/08/2017 05/23/2017
Richard Orth (239-252-5092)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
05/23/2017

Comment #1 Please provide a drainage plan that identifies the development's stormwater design limitations, internal drainage easements, control structure location, off-site discharge point, and downstream conveyance per the Regional Stormwater Management Study for the Harvey Basin and existing Regis PUD infrastructure.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
05/23/2017

Comment #2 To accommodate any future offsite flows, please modify Exhibit C Master Plan to include drainage to the 30 foot Right-of-Way (ROW) Easement identified along the west and south PUD boundary.
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 06/08/2017 06/07/2017
Summer Araque (239-252-6290)   Send Email
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Provide the following in the Environmental Data report (LDC 3.08.00): b. WHO PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. f. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03
LDC 3.05.07 A. Preserve Selection
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Areas excluded from the native vegetation retention calculations will have to be field verified by County staff. Have the environmental consultant contact County staff (Stephen Lenberger, 239-252-2915) to arrange for a site visit of the subject property. The native vegetation retention (preserve) requirement referenced on the PUD master plan and in the PUD document, environmental data and evaluation criteria in the application may all have to be revised pending outcome of the site visit with staff.
Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. PUD Master Plan Contents #4. PUD Minimum Acreage
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Add the following environmental commitment to section 1 of Exhibit F of the PUD document. “The portion of the 30 foot ROW easement within the preserve will need to be vacated prior to final plat or SDP approval, whichever is applicable.”
LDC 10.02.13 A.2. PUD Unique Features
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13 A.2.) Specifically, a bear management plan will be required. Replace section 1.b of Exhibit F of the PUD document with the following: “A management plan for Florida black bear shall be submitted for review and approval at time of final plat or SDP for the project, whichever is applicable.” Delete the last sentence in Environmental commitment 1.a. Amend the second allowable use within the uses in the preserve section of the PUD document to read as follows. “Mitigation for environmental permitting.”
Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. PUD Master Plan Contents #4. PUD Minimum Acreage
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Amend Note number 3 on the PUD master plan to read as follows. “Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07.” Consult with the Principal Planner to verify which note shall be provided for this petition. An additional landscape buffer outside of the preseve may be requried due the amount of exotics within the preserve.
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 06/08/2017 05/10/2017
Thomas Mastroberto (239-252-7348)   Send Email
Public Utilities - PUED Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 06/08/2017 06/08/2017
Eric Fey (239-252-2434)   Send Email
2.10 Utility Provisions
Resolved
06/08/2017

The LOSS for potable water is 150 gpcd and the average occupancy for Census Tract 104.15 is 2.1 persons per dwelling unit according to 2010 Census redistricting data. Use this information and a peak season multiplier of 1.2 to estimate demand. For group housing, use the LOSS in conjunction with an appropriate permanent population based on anticipated occupancy.
2.10 Utility Provisions
Resolved
06/08/2017

The LOSS for wastewater is 100 gpcd and the average occupancy for Census Tract 104.15 is 2.1 persons per dwelling unit according to 2010 Census redistricting data. Use this information and a peak season multiplier of 1.2 to estimate demand. For group housing, use the LOSS in conjunction with an appropriate permanent population based on anticipated occupancy.
2.10 Utility Provisions
Resolved
06/08/2017

Provide a notarized utility dedication statement. This is required at the time of PUD rezoning and may not be deferred until development permit.
Transportation Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 06/08/2017 06/08/2017
Michael Sawyer (239-252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.2: TIS updated to 2016 AUIR however appears Tables 2B and 2C contain incorrect traffic counts for Immokalee Road segment 43.1 (I-75 to Logan), please correct to be consistent with 2016 counts. Rev.1: As discussed please update TIS to include 2016 AUIR calc's, specifically page 5 (general AUIR references, 5.1 (Table 2B) and page 5.2 (Table 2C). The BCC approved the AUIR last month and because this petition will be at hearing in 2017 the TIS needs to be current. The change will only reflect notes/references and current calc's...not the conclusions of the TIS.
Developer Commitments
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Developer commitments made as a condition of zoning are not adequately addressed Rev.2: Adjacent access easment information provided with second submittal. A developer agreement is still required to limit trips for the proposed PUD consistent with TIS provided (85 PM peak our two-way trips). Rev.1: Please provide a developer commitment regarding the shared access for the development (and adjacent development) on Immokalee. Please provide timing of a required easement to accommodate the access on the adjacent parcel, the timing needs to be tied to SDP/Plat approval or possibly building CO.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Resolved
06/08/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: On the conceptual master plan please remove the small section of sidewalk shown in the east side of proposed shared access. This petition is not proposing any deviations from required sidewalks and to avoid confusion removing this section will address concerns. Alternatively show sidewalks on both sides of all roads/access/ROW's.
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 06/08/2017 06/13/2017
Nancy Gundlach (239-252-2484)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/12/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Staff does not support Deviation #2. Group home uses, whether its 55 and over or memory care, have outdoor recreation as part of the residential component.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/12/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please explain the 30' ROW easement. Is this to be vacated?
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Note 1 on the Development Standards should be 23' from the sidewalk.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections The Legal Description for Exhibit D Parcel 2 is different from the Legal Description on the Survey. Please reconcile.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Due to the number of exotics within the preserve, additional buffering is needed. Please show how the required Type B Landscape requirements will be met along the southern property line.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please specify one individual (not two) as the Managing Entity in the PUD Monitoring Commitment # 3.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please see attached red-lines to the PUD document.
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 06/08/2017 06/07/2017
Scott Stone (239-252-5740)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/07/2017

Please provide an Affidavit of Authorization for each parcel--one Affidavit of Authorization from "[insert name] as [insert title] of Royal Palm Nursery, a Florida General Partnership", and one Affidavit of Authorization from "[insert name] as Trustee of Thomas John Cleary Family Trust, and Raymond J. Cleary, Jr."
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/07/2017

Please provide a Convenant of Unified Control for each parcel--one Covenant of Unified Control from "[insert name] as [insert title] of Royal Palm Nursery, a Florida General Partnership", and one Covenant of Unified Control from "[insert name] as Trustee of Thomas John Cleary Family Trust, and Raymond J. Cleary, Jr."
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/07/2017

Your application indicates that Raymon J. Cleary Jr and Thomas J Cleary Family Trust each own 50% of the PUD property. However, they each only own 50% of ONE of the PUD parcels. The other parcel is owned by Royal Palm Nursery, a Florida General Partnership. Please revise the "Disclosure of Interest Information" section in the application to accurately describe all of the owners of the PUD property and their respective percentage of ownership.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/07/2017

Royal Palm Nursery, a FL General Partnership is not listed as an active entity in Florida on sunbiz.org. Please provide evidence that they are an active and legal entity in Florida.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/07/2017

Please provide a list of all of the beneficiaries of the Thomas John Cleary Family Trust.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/07/2017

Please list all partners, shareholders and/or those with an equitable interest in Royal Palm Nursery, a Florida General Partnership.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/07/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
06/07/2017

You may need to add a developer commitment re: shared access from Immokalee Road.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Provide a copy of the ROW Easement (OR 1097, PG 2181). Staff will need to confirm whether this ROW is permitted within the preserve area, per LDC. UPDATE 6/7/17--The legal description for the ROW easement that you added to the Master Plan in this submittal (OR 111, PG 129) appears to indicate that the easement is located on the EASTERLY 30 feet of the property, not the WESTERLY 30 feet.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

See markups on PUD Document provided by separate e-mail by the assigned planner.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

In your response to evluation criteria submitted with the second submittal, you indicate that you are entitled to 37 DUs because you calculated the allowance based on the parent parcel (9.25 acres) before the taking relating to the Immokalee Road expansion. Was the 0.25 acres taken in fee simple or as an easement? If fee simple, then you should not include that 0.25 acres in your dwelling unit calculation (i.e--it would be 36, not 37, dwelling units) Note--it appears that you changed the number at 36 in the PUD document, so perhaps you left the number 37 in your evaluation criteria responses by mistake?
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

Please confirm that this will not require a GMP Amendment.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
06/28/2017

It does not appear that you included responses to the criteria for Rezones under LDC Section 10.02.08 F. Please provide a response to each of the enumerated criteria under that section.

1 Initial Submittal      Status: Returned for Correction
Review Application Type Outcome Est. Completion Completed
Addressing - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 12/14/2016 12/14/2016
Annis Moxam (239-252-5519)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Per maps there is a ROW (John Michael RD) along the Westerly property line. On Exhibit C Master Plan, the Northern portion of the ROW is not shown. The OR 1097 PG 2181 is for the Southern portion, please add the Northern portion of the ROW and provide OR Book and Page (for the portion not shown).
Comprehensive Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 12/14/2016 12/07/2016
Corby Schmidt (239-252-2944)   Send Email
Outstanding
12/07/2016

Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections - provided in separate document (included herein).
Engineering Stormwater Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 12/14/2016 12/14/2016
Liz Gosselin (239-252-5687)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
05/23/2017

Comment #1 Please provide a drainage plan that identifies the development's stormwater design limitations, internal drainage easements, control structure location, off-site discharge point, and downstream conveyance per the Regional Stormwater Management Study for the Harvey Basin and existing Regis PUD infrastructure.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Resolved
05/23/2017

Comment #2 To accommodate any future offsite flows, please modify Exhibit C Master Plan to include drainage to the 30 foot Right-of-Way (ROW) Easement identified along the west and south PUD boundary.
Environmental Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 12/14/2016 12/07/2016
Summer Araque (239-252-6290)   Send Email
LDC 3.08.00. Environmental Data Requirements
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): a. The report provided by the consultant specifically states in the Introduction it was done for the purpose of identifying the potential for either U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and/or South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) jurisdictional wetlands; and for listed species inhabiting the site. However, the report does not evaluate the site for the Collier County preservation requirements. Please revise the Environmental report to focus on the County requirements and remove references to other agency requirements. b. WHO PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. c. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. d. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. e. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered f. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 g. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. h. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. i. Provide an exhibit clearly showing which areas are native vegetation for the Preserve calculation. Explain why specific areas were excluded as native vegetation. j. Demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Include an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. k. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project’s compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) i. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. ii. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. iii. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. iv. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project’s design compensates for wetland impacts.
LDC 3.05.07 A. Preserve Selection
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off-site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07 H.1.f.) This will be determined after the FLUCFCS map is provied.
Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. PUD Master Plan Contents #4. PUD Minimum Acreage
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

The calculation on the Master Plan and on page 7 of 7 are not consistent. Please correct. Also, there is a 30 foot ROW easement identified in the Preserve. Is this going to be removed? This easement cannot be in the Preserve. Staff can stipulate the removal of the ROW easement. Otherwise, place the Preserve outside of the ROW easement
LDC 10.02.13 A.2. PUD Unique Features
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13 A.2.) Please remove the Environmental commitment related to gopher tortoise as there were none found on site.
Fire Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 12/14/2016 11/15/2016
Thomas Mastroberto (239-252-7348)   Send Email
Graphics - GIS Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 12/14/2016 12/13/2016
Jessica Huckeba (239-252-2315)   Send Email
Historical Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 12/14/2016 11/21/2016
Ray Bellows (239-252-2463)   Send Email
Parks and Rec Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 12/14/2016 12/14/2016
Vicky Ahmad (239-282-4047)   Send Email
Public Utilities - PUED Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 12/14/2016 12/14/2016
Eric Fey (239-252-2434)   Send Email
2.10 Utility Provisions
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

The LOSS for potable water is 150 gpcd and the average occupancy for Census Tract 104.15 is 2.1 persons per dwelling unit according to 2010 Census redistricting data. Use this information and a peak season multiplier of 1.2 to estimate demand. For group housing, use the LOSS in conjunction with an appropriate permanent population based on anticipated occupancy.
2.10 Utility Provisions
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

The LOSS for wastewater is 100 gpcd and the average occupancy for Census Tract 104.15 is 2.1 persons per dwelling unit according to 2010 Census redistricting data. Use this information and a peak season multiplier of 1.2 to estimate demand. For group housing, use the LOSS in conjunction with an appropriate permanent population based on anticipated occupancy.
2.10 Utility Provisions
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Provide a notarized utility dedication statement. This is required at the time of PUD rezoning and may not be deferred until development permit.
Transportation Pathways Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 12/14/2016 11/29/2016
Laurie Beard (239-649-5782)   Send Email
Transportation Planning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 12/14/2016 12/14/2016
Michael Sawyer (239-252-2926)   Send Email
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: As discussed please update TIS to include 2016 AUIR calc's, specifically page 5 (general AUIR references, 5.1 (Table 2B) and page 5.2 (Table 2C). The BCC approved the AUIR last month and because this petition will be at hearing in 2017 the TIS needs to be current. The change will only reflect notes/references and current calc's...not the conclusions of the TIS.
Developer Commitments
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Developer commitments made as a condition of zoning are not adequately addressed Rev.1: Please provide a developer commitment regarding the shared access for the development (and adjacent development) on Immokalee. Please provide timing of a required easement to accommodate the access on the adjacent parcel, the timing needs to be tied to SDP/Plat approval or possibly building CO.
Additional Comments - Transportation Planning.
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: On the conceptual master plan please remove the small section of sidewalk shown in the east side of proposed shared access. This petition is not proposing any deviations from required sidewalks and to avoid confusion removing this section will address concerns. Alternatively show sidewalks on both sides of all roads/access/ROW's.
Zoning Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 12/14/2016 12/21/2016
Daniel Smith (239-252-4312)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Staff does not support Deviation #2. Group home uses, whether its 55 and over or memory care, have outdoor recreation as part of the residential component.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Please explain the 30' ROW easement. Is this to be vacated?
Miscellaneous Corrections
Withdrawn
12/21/2016

Miscellaneous Corrections Please label the project to a Mixed Use PUD (MPUD). You are proposing Community Facility and Commercial uses (memory care) as an alternative to residential uses.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Withdrawn
12/21/2016

Miscellaneous Corrections
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections Note 1 on the Development Standards should be 23' from the sidewalk.
County Attorney Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Rejected 12/14/2016 12/13/2016
Scott Stone (239-252-5740)   Send Email
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Please provide an Affidavit of Authorization for each parcel--one Affidavit of Authorization from "[insert name] as [insert title] of Royal Palm Nursery, a Florida General Partnership", and one Affidavit of Authorization from "[insert name] as Trustee of Thomas John Cleary Family Trust, and Raymond J. Cleary, Jr."
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Please provide a Convenant of Unified Control for each parcel--one Covenant of Unified Control from "[insert name] as [insert title] of Royal Palm Nursery, a Florida General Partnership", and one Covenant of Unified Control from "[insert name] as Trustee of Thomas John Cleary Family Trust, and Raymond J. Cleary, Jr."
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Your application indicates that Raymon J. Cleary Jr and Thomas J Cleary Family Trust each own 50% of the PUD property. However, they each only own 50% of ONE of the PUD parcels. The other parcel is owned by Royal Palm Nursery, a Florida General Partnership. Please revise the "Disclosure of Interest Information" section in the application to accurately describe all of the owners of the PUD property and their respective percentage of ownership.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Royal Palm Nursery, a FL General Partnership is not listed as an active entity in Florida on sunbiz.org. Please provide evidence that they are an active and legal entity in Florida.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Please provide a list of all of the beneficiaries of the Thomas John Cleary Family Trust.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Please list all partners, shareholders and/or those with an equitable interest in Royal Palm Nursery, a Florida General Partnership.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Miscellaneous Corrections
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

You may need to add a developer commitment re: shared access from Immokalee Road.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

Provide a copy of the ROW Easement (OR 1097, PG 2181). Staff will need to confirm whether this ROW is permitted within the preserve area, per LDC.
Miscellaneous Corrections
Carried Forward
05/10/2017

See markups on PUD Document provided by separate e-mail by the assigned planner.
Landscape Review Planned Unit Development Rezone Approved 12/14/2016 12/21/2016
Daniel Smith (239-252-4312)   Send Email

Fees
Paid Fees Amount Paid Owing Date Paid
Pre-application Meeting $500.00 $500.00 Paid 08/25/2016
Comp Planning Review - Planned Unit Development $2,250.00 $2,250.00 Paid 11/14/2016
Planned Unit Development $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Paid 11/14/2016
Site Area (Acreage) fee $225.00 $225.00 Paid 11/14/2016
Fire Code Review - Planned Unit Development $150.00 $150.00 Paid 11/14/2016
Legal Advertising Fee $1,125.00 $1,125.00 Paid 11/14/2016
Legal Advertising Fee (BCC) $500.00 $500.00 Paid 11/14/2016
Environmental Impact Statement Base fee $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Paid 11/14/2016
TIS Methodology Review $500.00 $500.00 Paid 11/14/2016
TIS Major Study Review $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Paid 11/14/2016
Graphics Property Notification Address Listing $85.00 $85.00 Paid 01/05/2017
Outstanding Fees Amount Paid Owing Date Paid
No outstanding fees.


Your project will not be reviewed until all fees are paid in full.

Inspections

There are no inspections for this planning application.

Documents & Images
Date Uploaded Document Name
08/10/2016 Addressing Checklist (CPRZ Addressing Checklist.pdf)
08/24/2016 PL Payment Slip
08/24/2016 PRE-APP NOTES.pdf
08/25/2016 Receipt for transaction: 2016-053711
11/15/2016 Cover Letter/Narrative Statement (Submittal 1 Cover Ltr 11-14-2016 - Prepared.pdf)
06/07/2017 Affidavit of Authorization/Evidence of Authority (Submittal 2 Affidavit of Authorization - Prepared.pdf)
11/14/2016 Submittal 1 - Survey
07/24/2017 Application Form (Submittal 3 Application - PUD Rezone_v2 - Prepared.pdf)
11/14/2016 Submittal 1 - Addressing Checklist
05/09/2017 Submittal 2 - Statement of Utility Provision
07/10/2017 Exhibits A-F (Submittal 3 Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v2 - Prepared.pdf)
05/09/2017 Submittal 2 - List of Requested Deviations
06/07/2017 Covenant of Unified Control (Submittal 2 Covenant of Unified Control - Prepared.pdf)
11/14/2016 Submittal 1 - Historical Archeological Survey
11/14/2016 Submittal 1 - School Impact Analysis
11/14/2016 Submittal 1 - Warranty Deed
11/16/2016 Aerial Photographs (Submittal 1 Aerial - Prepared.pdf)
06/28/2017 Submittal 3 - Environmental Data Requirements
05/10/2017 Submittal 2 - Traffic Impact Study (TIS)
11/14/2016 Submittal 1 - Pre-App Notes
11/14/2016 Incomplete Submittal Letter (INC)
11/14/2016 Receipt for transaction: 2016-074070
11/14/2016 Check Overage Form
11/14/2016 PL Payment Slip
11/14/2016 Submittal 1 - RLS - Cleary RPUD
12/07/2016 PUDZ-PL2016-1985 Cleary R1 Con Rev_FNL.pdf
12/21/2016 Insufficiency Letter (INSF)
01/04/2017 PL Payment Slip
01/05/2017 Receipt for transaction: 2017-000709
04/13/2017 Affidavit of Compliance 04-10-2017.pdf
06/28/2017 Submittal 3 - Response Letter
05/09/2017 Submittal 2 - Quit-Claim Deed Book111 PG129
05/09/2017 Submittal 2 - Record of OR1097 PG2181
05/10/2017 Incomplete Submittal Letter (INC)
05/10/2017 Submittal 2 - RLS
06/01/2017 PUDZ-PL2016-1985 Cleary R2 Con Rev.pdf
06/13/2017 Insufficiency Letter (INSF)
06/28/2017 Submittal 3 - Stipulated Final Judgment
06/28/2017 Submittal 3 - RLS
07/21/2017 PUDZ-PL2016-1985 Cleary R3 Con Rev_fnl.pdf
Submittals | Portal Home
Powered by CityView